认证

时间轴

• 

  春季学期:

  HLC Steering Committee 和 Working Groups 编写初稿 保证参数

• 

  2019年夏天: 

  规划委员会 Reviews First Draft 和 Writes Second Draft with Writing Team

• 

  2019年秋季- 2020年春季

  校园-Wide Engagement 活动 和 事件

• 

  2020年夏天

  Planning Team Finalizes Arguments with Stakeholder Input, Submits Final Arguments to HLC

• 

  2020年初秋: 

  最后确定HLC校园访问的细节

• 

  2020年10月19日至20日:

  HLC同行评审员参观校园

The Open Pathway’s 10-year cycle includes the following institutional reviews:

• 定期监测

  Institutions submit an annual Institutional Update, which is reviewed by HLC to monitor organizational health, 遵守某些联邦要求, 和 identify any changes that may require HLC follow up. HLC will also apply change processes as appropriate to planned institutional developments, 和 will monitor institutions through reports, visits 和 other means as it deems appropriate.

• 第四年:鉴证审查

  Institutions complete an Assurance Review to ensure they are continuing to meet HLC’s Criteria for 认证. The institution provides documentation demonstrating how it fulfills each Criterion 和 Core Component. A peer review team evaluates these materials 和 recommends whether the institution should continue in the cycle or whether additional monitoring is required. HLC’s Institutional Actions Council (IAC) reviews 和 takes official action on the recommendation.

• 第5至第9年级:质量倡议

  Institutions design 和 undertake a Quality Initiative project. HLC peer reviewers approve an initial project proposal, as well as a report on the outcomes of the project.

• 10年级:综合评价

  Note: This will occur at the University of Denver in October 2020.

  Institutions undergo a comprehensive evaluation to ensure they are meeting the Criteria for 认证, pursuing institutional improvement 和 complying with certain requirements set by the U.S. 教育部. This review leads to an action regarding the reaffirmation of the institution’s accreditation.

  更多yzcca88游戏登录网址综合评价:

  HLC conducts comprehensive evaluations of member institutions to confirm that the institution continues to meet the Criteria for 认证, is pursuing institutional improvement 和 complies with requirements sets by the U.S. 教育部. Evaluations are conducted by teams of peer reviewers.

  The evaluation that occurs in the final year of each pathway cycle—Year 10 for Open Pathway—includes an action regarding the institution’s reaffirmation of accreditation.

保证论证

HLC conducts an Assurance Review to determine whether an institution continues to meet the Criteria for 认证, 每4年和10年一次. The University of Denver is approaching our 10 year review 和 is currently drafting assurance arguments 和 collecting evidence for our comprehensive evaluation in 2020. The assurance arguments detail how the University is meeting the criteria set forth by HLC, 利用网站等资料, 政策, 报告和更多的证据. The Criteria for 认证 are as follows:

• 标准一:使命
  • The institution’s mission 是公开明确的吗; it guides the institution’s operations.
• Criterion 2: Integrity: Ethical 和 Responsible Conduct
  • The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical 和 responsible.
• Criterion 3: Teaching 和 Learning: Quality, Resources, 和 Support
  • The institution provides high quality education, wherever 和 however its offerings are delivered.
• Criterion 4: Teaching 和 Learning: Evaluation 和 Improvement
  • The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational 项目, 学习环境, 支持服务, 和 it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.
• Criterion 5: Resources, Planning, 和 Institutional Effectiveness
  • 机构的资源, 结构, 和 processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, 和 respond to future challenges 和 opportunities. 该机构为未来做计划.

The University will submit both the assurance arguments with an evidence file, using HLC’S online Assurance System in the summer of 2020 after significant consultation with campus stakeholders, 包括教师, 教职员及学生. 在DU的校园访问之前, a team of peer reviewers evaluates the assurance argument with corresponding evidence to provide a recommendation as to whether the institution meets the Criteria for 认证.

参观结束后, a decision-making body within HLC reviews the University’s materials 和 the recommendation from the peer review team 和 takes official action.

认证委员会

• 差距分析小组

  The Gaps Analysis group is reviewing all five criterion arguments 和 identify the gaps where content 和/or evidence is missing 和 needed.

  名字	Title
  凯西全垒打	Interim 副教务长 of Internationalization
  艾德丽安冈萨雷斯	导演 of the Center for 世界语言和文化
  克林特·艾默里奇	助理教务长，预算和分析
  基斯米勒	Interim Associate Provost of 研究生教育
  米歇尔·汉娜	Associate 教授, 社会工作研究生院
  理查德·科尔比	Assistant 导演, First Year Writing, 和 教学教授, 写作计划
  芯片Reichardt	教授,心理学
  克里斯蒂娜Paguyo	学术评估主任
  Allison Friederichs	副院长 和 教学副教授, 大学学院
  莎拉·霍夫曼	助理教务长，学生成功
  Deigan银	Associate 教授, Media, Film 和 Journalism Studies, 导演, CILCA
  金伯利本德	临时研究副教务长
  Lory-Ann万利拉	Interim Executive 导演 of 文化, Access 和 Transitions Program

   

• 标准一:使命

  The Mission Committee is responsible for ensuring the University's mission, 指导我们的运作, 是公开明确的吗. Thank you to the following people for drafting the initial argument for Criterion 1:

  名字	Title	单位
  克里斯汀的交易	临时负责人	多样性和包容性办公室
  卡拉DiEnno	副主任	Center for Community Engagement to advance Scholarship 和 Learning
  Allana的强项	助理副校长	招生
  顶楼的玻璃	制片助理导演	纽曼中心
  特里萨埃尔南德斯*	助理副校长, 校园 Partnerships	信息技术
  达希克斯*	传播学教授	College of 艺术, Humanities 和 Social 科学s
  玛德琳菲普斯	Sr. 媒体关系专员	Department of Marketing 和 Communications
  奥德丽斯齐亚沃尼	助教	写作计划

  * -委员会主席

• 标准2:诚信

  The Integrity Committee is responsible for ensuring that the University acts with integrity 和 that our conduct is ethical 和 responsible. Thank you to the following people for drafting the initial argument for Criterion 2:

  名字	Title	单位
  莎拉Buenavidez	研究生招生副主任	研究生教育
  布莱恩·冈萨雷斯	临床助理教授	社会工作研究生院
  妮基拉丁裔	副校长	ca88登录正确网址和包容性卓越
  Jerron劳	人力资源伙伴关系总监	人力资源和包容性社区
  盖Sisk *	教授	Josef Korbel School of International Studies
  温蒂芙尼	导演	内部审计
  保罗Kosempel *	教学副教授, Pioneer Leadership Living 和 Learning Community	先锋领袖计划
  Audry LaCrone	通信管理器	研究和赞助项目办公室

  * -委员会主席

• Criterion 3: Teaching 和 Learning — Quality, Resources 和 Support

  教与学——质量, Resources 和 Support Committee is responsible for ensuring the University provides high quality education, wherever 和 however our offerings are delivered. Thank you to the following people for drafting the initial argument for Criterion 3:

  名字	Title	单位
  Ayla Engelhart	学生外展副主任	ca88登录正确网址和包容性卓越
  布莱恩Gearity *	董事，硕士教练和体育教育	Graduate School of Professional Psychology
  安西亚·约翰逊·鲁恩	主管，大学ca88登录正确网址和管道	ca88登录正确网址和包容性卓越
  理查德·科尔比	教学副教授	写作计划
  Luc Beaudoin	国际化副校长	国际化办公室
  维吉尼亚皮特	大学教学主任	教与学办公室
  艾德丽安冈萨雷斯	临时负责人	世界语言和文化
  英格丽Tague *	副院长	College of 艺术, Humanities 和 Social 科学s

  * -委员会主席

• Criterion 4: Teaching 和 Learning — Evaluation 和 Improvement

  The Teaching 和 Learning — Evaluation 和 Improvement Committee is responsible for ensuring the University demonstrates responsibility for the quality of our educational 项目, 学习环境 支持服务. The committee also evaluates the effectiveness of those 项目, environments 和 services for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement. Thank you to the following people for drafting the initial argument for Criterion 4:

  名字	Title	单位
  詹妮弗•安德森	CPD信息和系统副总监	职业和专业发展
  迈克尔·布兰特	Assistant 教授, Department of Philosophy	College of 艺术, Humanities 和 Social 科学s
  米歇尔Kruse-Crocker	教学副教授	大学学院
  克里斯蒂娜Paguyo	学术评估主任	教与学办公室
  玛吉红色*	副院长，项目和合作伙伴	科罗拉多女子学院
  南希·佐佐木	教学教授	自然科学与数学
  雷切尔·沃尔什	Associate 教授, Languages 和 Literatures	College of 艺术, Humanities 和 Social 科学s
  凯特Willink *	教学主任	教与学办公室

  * -委员会主席

• Criterion 5: Resources, Planning 和 Institutional Effectiveness

  的资源, Planning 和 Institutional Effectiveness Committee's responsibility is to ensure the University's resources, 结构 和 processes are sufficient to fulfill our mission, improve the quality of our educational offerings 和 respond to future challenges 和 opportunities. Thank you to the following people for drafting the initial argument for Criterion 5:

  名字	Title	单位
  艾米丽·艾伦	项目协调人	先锋领袖计划
  唐熏肉	教授,营销	丹尼尔斯商学院
  琳达这些*	副教务长	计划及预算
  安德拉马丁内斯	助理控制器	控制器的办公室
  芯片Reichardt *	教授,心理学	College of 艺术, Humanities 和 Social 科学s
  基思•罗兹	助教	写作计划
  詹姆斯Rosner	副校长	设施
  香农密封	学习及发展顾问	人力资源和包容性社区

  * -委员会主席

• 规划委员会
  • Jennifer Karas, 副教务长 of Academic Affairs 
  • Alex Lustig，项目经理